Round 15 · 2026 · 26 Sep

Baku City Circuit

Baku, Azerbaijan

Results & qualifying →

Race debrief

Share this debrief
Elo × qualifying → race result

Did they beat the expectation?

Experimental · v1
Model & data

A strong driver recovering from a poor qualifying position isn't automatically a surprise. This model estimates a finish from both pre-race Elo and qualifying, then compares it with what happened.

Expected finish assumes a classified finish. DNFs stay in the full grid but receive no performance verdict. Qualifying is not the starting grid; grid differences are flagged, not silently substituted.

Fit on 862 earlier finishes across 51 races, 2016–2026. No results from this race enter its expectation.

22 stored results 22/22 Elo snapshots 22/22 numbered grid slots 22/22 qualifying results

Missing Elo or qualifying stays visible in the full grid. A grid position is not used as a qualifying result.

Top 3

Beat the estimate
  1. Andrea Kimi Antonelli Mercedes · Elo #1 · Q16

    Expected P9.4 Finished P5

    +4.4places
  2. Arvid Lindblad RB F1 Team · Elo #10 · Q15

    Expected P11.4 Finished P7

    +4.4places
  3. Max Verstappen Red Bull · Elo #4 · Q8

    Expected P6.3 Finished P2

    +4.3places

Flop 3

Below the estimate
  1. Oscar Piastri McLaren · Elo #7 · Q3

    Expected P4.6 Finished P13

    −8.4places
  2. Liam Lawson RB F1 Team · Elo #9 · Q12

    Expected P9.6 Finished P12

    −2.4places
  3. Gabriel Bortoleto Audi · Elo #13 · Q17

    Expected P13.2 Finished P15

    −1.8places
15/22 entrants assessed. DNFs excluded. How we rank

Up to three per side, ranked by expected minus actual finish. DNFs, missing estimates and gaps rounding to 0.0 are excluded. “Flop” means below the model's estimate—not poor driving. A ranked gap can still be inside the usual error range.

Full grid: pre-race Elo rank, qualifying position, estimated finish, actual result and difference from expectation. Positive differences mean finishing ahead of the estimate.
DriverPre-race EloQualifyingExpectedResultP1 ← position → P22vs expectedReading
G. RussellMercedes #32410 P1 P2.5P1–P7 P1 +1.5places In range
M. VerstappenRed Bull #42364 P8 P6.3P2–P10 P2 +4.3places In range
I. HadjarRed Bull #82286 P4 P5.4P1–P9 P3 +2.4places In range
C. LeclercFerrari #62329 P2 P3.8P1–P8 P4 −0.2places In range
A. AntonelliMercedes #12464 P16 P9.4P5–P14 P5 +4.4places In range
L. HamiltonFerrari #52345 P6 P5.5P1–P10 P6 −0.5places In range
A. LindbladRB F1 Team #102197 P15 P11.4P7–P15 P7 +4.4places In range
E. OconHaas F1 Team #152056 P14 Grid P13 P12.3P8–P16 P8 +4.3places In range
O. BearmanHaas F1 Team #172015 P11 Grid P10 P11.3P7–P15 P9 +2.3places In range
C. SainzWilliams #162034 P9 Grid P14 P10.0P6–P14 P10 0.0places In range
N. HülkenbergAudi #142116 P18 P14.0P10–P18 P11 +3.0places In range
L. LawsonRB F1 Team #92238 P12 Grid P11 P9.6P6–P14 P12 −2.4places In range
O. PiastriMcLaren #72314 P3 P4.6P1–P9 P13 −8.4places Below range
S. PérezCadillac F1 Team #201936 P20 P16.6P13–P21 P14 +2.6places In range
G. BortoletoAudi #132153 P17 P13.2P9–P17 P15 −1.8places In range
V. BottasCadillac F1 Team #221864 P22 Grid P19 P18.1P14–P22 DNFRetired — Not assessedDNF: Retired
F. ColapintoAlpine F1 Team #122163 P10 Grid P9 P9.4P5–P14 DNFRetired — Not assessedDNF: Retired
P. GaslyAlpine F1 Team #112195 P7 P7.7P4–P12 DNFRetired — Not assessedDNF: Retired
L. NorrisMcLaren #22432 P5 P4.2P1–P8 DNFRetired — Not assessedDNF: Retired
A. AlbonWilliams #191985 P13 Grid P12 P12.9P9–P17 DNFRetired — Not assessedDNF: Retired
F. AlonsoAston Martin #181993 P19 Grid P21 P15.6P11–P20 DNFRetired — Not assessedDNF: Retired
L. StrollAston Martin #211882 P21 Grid P22 P17.4P13–P21 DNFRetired — Not assessedDNF: Retired
How useful is the model? See the historical check

Average absolute error on 862 classified finishes in 51 earlier races within the last ten years. Each race was held out and predicted using only older races; all three models use the same samples.

Elo + qualifying
2.19places
Qualifying only
2.34places
Elo only
2.72places

The range scales the 80th percentile of earlier held-out absolute errors to this field size, rounding outward. It is an empirical error guide, not a guaranteed 80% chance for a particular driver. We require at least five checked races and 100 checked finishes before showing it.

Inputs are field-normalised Elo rank and qualifying position. The target is position among all race entries, trained only on classified finishers. Estimates are averages, not a unique predicted finishing order. Penalties, the circuit, weather, incidents and strategy aren't model inputs. Historical qualifying coverage is patchy; this is an exploratory backtest on corrected records, not proof of live forecasting accuracy.

The rating ledger

What changed in Elo?

These are actual rating changes. The expectation model above does not change Elo or fantasy scoring.

Largest Elo gain

Ocon+35.0 Elo

Largest Elo loss

Norris−73.8 Elo

Largest grid-to-finish gain

Antonelli+11 places

The bigger picture

Championship after this round

Top five in the stored standings. Points include sprint results where applicable.

  1. 1 Antonelli 302pts 0
  2. 2 Russell 236pts 0
  3. 3 Hamilton 199pts 0
  4. 4 Norris 186pts 0
  5. 5 Leclerc 179pts 0

Movement since round 14. A dash means the earlier standing is unavailable.

Explore the season →
Across the garage

Teammate results

Two-driver constructor entries from this race. A result comparison, not an adjustment for strategy or reliability.

Williams

SainzP10+26.8 Elo
AlbonDNF−21.7 Elo

Non-finish recorded; no finishing gap comparison.

Q2 · Sainz 0.372s faster

McLaren

PiastriP13−27.4 Elo
NorrisDNF−73.8 Elo

Non-finish recorded; no finishing gap comparison.

Q3 · Piastri 0.308s faster

Aston Martin

AlonsoDNF−28.3 Elo
StrollDNF−21.6 Elo

Non-finish recorded; no finishing gap comparison.

Q1 · Alonso 0.744s faster

What this analysis can—and cannot—tell you

This debrief is calculated from stored results and rating snapshots. The experimental expectation model learns from earlier races only, using Elo rank and qualifying together; it never feeds back into Elo. It is not a separately reviewed race report.

Elo uses the result order, including retirements. It does not isolate driver skill from the car, reliability, penalties or strategy. Elo seed comparisons use pre-race ratings, never today's ratings. Equal ratings share the midpoint of their rank range (for example, tied first and second become seed 1.5).

Grid gains use numbered starting slots and classified finishes only. Zero or missing grid values are excluded; a position gained is not necessarily an overtake. Qualifying gaps use the latest segment both teammates have a valid time for, never Q1 against Q3.

Lap-by-lap pace, tyre stints, pit-stop execution and safety-car effects are not available in this report. Missing data is omitted, not inferred.

Read the Elo methodology →