Round 9 · 2012 · 8 Jul

Silverstone Circuit

Silverstone, UK

Results & qualifying →

Race debrief

Share this debrief
Elo × qualifying → race result

Did they beat the expectation?

Experimental · v1
Model & data

A strong driver recovering from a poor qualifying position isn't automatically a surprise. This model estimates a finish from both pre-race Elo and qualifying, then compares it with what happened.

Expected finish assumes a classified finish. DNFs stay in the full grid but receive no performance verdict. Qualifying is not the starting grid; grid differences are flagged, not silently substituted.

Fit on 509 earlier finishes across 33 races, 2002–2012. No results from this race enter its expectation.

24 stored results 24/24 Elo snapshots 24/24 numbered grid slots 24/24 qualifying results

Missing Elo or qualifying stays visible in the full grid. A grid position is not used as a qualifying result.

Top 3

Beat the estimate
  1. Romain Grosjean Lotus F1 · Elo #12 · Q10

    Expected P8.9 Finished P6

    +2.9places
  2. Felipe Massa Ferrari · Elo #11 · Q5

    Expected P6.5 Finished P4

    +2.5places
  3. Bruno Senna Williams · Elo #14 · Q15

    Expected P11.4 Finished P9

    +2.4places

Flop 3

Below the estimate
  1. Pastor Maldonado Williams · Elo #16 · Q7

    Expected P8.5 Finished P16

    −7.5places
  2. Nico Rosberg Mercedes · Elo #4 · Q13

    Expected P8.3 Finished P15

    −6.7places
  3. Nico Hülkenberg Force India · Elo #10 · Q9

    Expected P8.0 Finished P12

    −4.0places
21/24 entrants assessed. DNFs excluded. How we rank

Up to three per side, ranked by expected minus actual finish. DNFs, missing estimates and gaps rounding to 0.0 are excluded. “Flop” means below the model's estimate—not poor driving. A ranked gap can still be inside the usual error range.

Full grid: pre-race Elo rank, qualifying position, estimated finish, actual result and difference from expectation. Positive differences mean finishing ahead of the estimate.
DriverPre-race EloQualifyingExpectedResultP1 ← position → P24vs expectedReading
M. WebberRed Bull #22477 P2 P3.1P1–P8 P1 +2.1places In range
F. AlonsoFerrari #12526 P1 P2.5P1–P8 P2 +0.5places In range
S. VettelRed Bull #32407 P4 P4.2P1–P9 P3 +1.2places In range
F. MassaFerrari #112182 P5 P6.5P1–P12 P4 +2.5places In range
K. RäikkönenLotus F1 #52367 P6 P5.5P1–P11 P5 +0.5places In range
R. GrosjeanLotus F1 #122071 P10 Grid P9 P8.9P4–P14 P6 +2.9places In range
M. SchumacherMercedes #152047 P3 P6.6P1–P12 P7 −0.4places In range
L. HamiltonMcLaren #62340 P8 P6.6P1–P12 P8 −1.4places In range
B. SennaWilliams #142061 P15 Grid P13 P11.4P6–P17 P9 +2.4places In range
J. ButtonMcLaren #72279 P18 Grid P16 P11.1P6–P16 P10 +1.1places In range
K. KobayashiSauber #132068 P12 Grid P17 P9.9P5–P15 P11 −1.1places In range
N. HülkenbergForce India #102193 P9 Grid P14 P8.0P3–P13 P12 −4.0places In range
D. RicciardoToro Rosso #172034 P14 Grid P12 P11.7P7–P17 P13 −1.3places In range
J. VergneToro Rosso #182028 P16 Grid P23 P12.8P8–P18 P14 −1.2places In range
N. RosbergMercedes #42370 P13 Grid P11 P8.3P3–P13 P15 −6.7places Below range
P. MaldonadoWilliams #162047 P7 P8.5P3–P14 P16 −7.5places Below range
H. KovalainenCaterham #201977 P20 Grid P19 P15.0P10–P20 P17 −2.0places In range
T. GlockMarussia #231857 P21 Grid P20 P16.1P11–P21 P18 −1.9places In range
C. PicMarussia #211914 P24 P16.9P12–P22 P19 −2.1places In range
P. de la RosaHRT #221887 P22 Grid P21 P16.3P11–P21 P20 −3.7places In range
N. KarthikeyanHRT #241818 P23 Grid P22 P17.2P12–P22 P21 −3.8places In range
S. PérezSauber #92216 P17 Grid P15 P11.1P6–P16 DNFCollision — Not assessedDNF: Collision
P. di RestaForce India #82249 P11 Grid P10 P8.4P3–P13 DNFCollision — Not assessedDNF: Collision
V. PetrovCaterham #191997 P19 Grid P18 P14.3P9–P19 DNFEngine — Not assessedDNF: Engine
How useful is the model? See the historical check

Average absolute error on 509 classified finishes in 33 earlier races within the last ten years. Each race was held out and predicted using only older races; all three models use the same samples.

Elo + qualifying
2.52places
Qualifying only
2.63places
Elo only
3.01places

The range scales the 80th percentile of earlier held-out absolute errors to this field size, rounding outward. It is an empirical error guide, not a guaranteed 80% chance for a particular driver. We require at least five checked races and 100 checked finishes before showing it.

Inputs are field-normalised Elo rank and qualifying position. The target is position among all race entries, trained only on classified finishers. Estimates are averages, not a unique predicted finishing order. Penalties, the circuit, weather, incidents and strategy aren't model inputs. Historical qualifying coverage is patchy; this is an exploratory backtest on corrected records, not proof of live forecasting accuracy.

The rating ledger

What changed in Elo?

These are actual rating changes. The expectation model above does not change Elo or fantasy scoring.

Largest grid-to-finish gain

Vergne+9 places

The bigger picture

Championship after this round

Top five in the stored standings. Points include sprint results where applicable.

  1. 1 Alonso 129pts 0
  2. 2 Webber 116pts 0
  3. 3 Vettel 100pts +1
  4. 4 Hamilton 92pts −1
  5. 5 Räikkönen 83pts +1

Movement since round 8. A dash means the earlier standing is unavailable.

Explore the season →
Across the garage

Teammate results

Two-driver constructor entries from this race. A result comparison, not an adjustment for strategy or reliability.

Red Bull

WebberP1+22.3 Elo
VettelP3+18.1 Elo

2 places apart at the finish.

Q3 · Webber 0.406s faster

Ferrari

AlonsoP2+11.8 Elo
MassaP4+44.0 Elo

2 places apart at the finish.

Q3 · Alonso 1.319s faster

McLaren

HamiltonP8−3.5 Elo
ButtonP10−7.0 Elo

2 places apart at the finish.

Q1 · Hamilton 0.611s faster

Williams

SennaP9+33.4 Elo
MaldonadoP16−6.5 Elo

7 places apart at the finish.

Q2 · Maldonado 0.624s faster

Sauber

KobayashiP11+20.2 Elo
PérezDNF−69.5 Elo

Non-finish recorded; no finishing gap comparison.

Q2 · Kobayashi 0.824s faster

Caterham

KovalainenP17−1.8 Elo
PetrovDNF−46.8 Elo

Non-finish recorded; no finishing gap comparison.

Q1 · Petrov 0.450s faster

Marussia

GlockP18+8.4 Elo
PicP19−4.8 Elo

1 place apart at the finish.

Q1 · Glock 2.525s faster

What this analysis can—and cannot—tell you

This debrief is calculated from stored results and rating snapshots. The experimental expectation model learns from earlier races only, using Elo rank and qualifying together; it never feeds back into Elo. It is not a separately reviewed race report.

Elo uses the result order, including retirements. It does not isolate driver skill from the car, reliability, penalties or strategy. Elo seed comparisons use pre-race ratings, never today's ratings. Equal ratings share the midpoint of their rank range (for example, tied first and second become seed 1.5).

Grid gains use numbered starting slots and classified finishes only. Zero or missing grid values are excluded; a position gained is not necessarily an overtake. Qualifying gaps use the latest segment both teammates have a valid time for, never Q1 against Q3.

Lap-by-lap pace, tyre stints, pit-stop execution and safety-car effects are not available in this report. Missing data is omitted, not inferred.

Read the Elo methodology →